Bad Behavior Toward Significant Other in Tough Times Has More Impact than Positive Gestures

Authored by baylor.edu and submitted by mvea

Refraining from criticism or abandonment is better than simply being encouraging, Baylor University study finds

Follow Baylor Media Communications on Twitter: @BaylorUMedia

WACO, Texas (June 26, 2018) — Refraining from bad behavior toward a significant other during stressful life events is more important than showing positive behavior, according to a Baylor University study.

Compared with positive gestures, negative ones tend to trigger more intense and immediate responses, according to the study. And how a couple works together during stressful times is associated with individual well-being as well as satisfaction with the relationship.

“When people face stressful life events, they are especially sensitive to negative behavior in their relationships, such as when a partner seems to be argumentative, overly emotional, withdrawn or fails to do something that was expected,” said researcher Keith Sanford, Ph.D., professor of psychology and neuroscience in Baylor’s College of Arts & Sciences.

“In contrast, they’re less sensitive to positive behavior — such as giving each other comfort,” he said.

The study also found that low doses of a behavior are most important, and over time, more extreme levels have less impact.

“Because people are especially sensitive to negative relationship behavior, a moderate dose may be sufficient to produce a nearly maximum effect on increasing life stress,” Sanford said. “After negative behavior reaches a certain saturation point, it appears that stress is only minimally affected by further increases in the dose of relationship problems.”

The study — “Negative Relationship Behavior Is More Important Than Positive: Correlates of Outcomes During Stressful Life Events” — is published in the Journal of Family Psychology. Sanford and co-researcher Alannah Shelby Rivers, doctoral candidate in psychology and neuroscience, surveyed couples experiencing stressful life events to measure their behavior, relationship satisfaction, personal well-being and quality of life.

The research consisted of two studies done using data from Internet samples.

In the first study, 325 couples who were married or living with a partner all reported experiences of at least one of six possible stressful events within the past month, including: losing a job, becoming a primary caregiver of an older relative, experiencing a parent’s death, experiencing a child’s death, not having enough resources to afford basic necessities, and experiencing bankruptcy, foreclosure or repossession of a house or car.

The second study included 154 people who were either married or living with a partner and experiencing a serious medical issue meeting one or more of these criteria: a condition requiring hospitalization or a trip to the emergency room, a serious chronic condition and a life-threatening condition. All participants reported that they had visited a medical practitioner within the past year for treatment of their conditions.

Researchers used a scale that included 18 items — nine for negative and nine for positive behavior. Participants were asked to remember the past month, then write a few words describing different memories of interactions occurring in their relationships and indicate how often specific types of interactions occurred in their relationships.

All participants also were asked questions about how rewarding their relationships were, their general well-being (such as being active and vigorous) and their quality of life (such as health). Those in the first study also were asked about stress, their coping strategies in general and their coping style in the relationship.

The second study, examining couple’s behavior during stressful medical events, showed lower levels of negative behavior than the first study dealing with other types of stressful issues.

“It is possible that couples facing stressful medical situations are less likely to blame each other,” researchers wrote.

“When people face stressful life events, it’s common to experience both positive and negative behavior in their relationships,” Sanford said. “When the goal is to increase feelings of well-being and lessen stress, it may be more important to decrease negative behavior than to increase positive actions.”

The research was funded in part by a grant from Baylor College of Medicine.

Baylor University is a private Christian University and a nationally ranked research institution. The University provides a vibrant campus community for more than 17,000 students by blending interdisciplinary research with an international reputation for educational excellence and a faculty commitment to teaching and scholarship. Chartered in 1845 by the Republic of Texas through the efforts of Baptist pioneers, Baylor is the oldest continually operating University in Texas. Located in Waco, Baylor welcomes students from all 50 states and more than 80 countries to study a broad range of degrees among its 12 nationally recognized academic divisions.

ABOUT BAYLOR COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES

The College of Arts & Sciences is Baylor University’s oldest and largest academic division, consisting of 25 academic departments and seven academic centers and institutes. The more than 5,000 courses taught in the College span topics from art and theatre to religion, philosophy, sociology and the natural sciences. Faculty conduct research around the world, and research on the undergraduate and graduate level is prevalent throughout all disciplines. Visit www.baylor.edu/artsandsciences.

twinned on June 27th, 2018 at 18:00 UTC »

To clear up what positive and negative behaviors are (in the context of this study), here's how it was measured:

participants were asked to list 9 positive and negative behaviors that had occurred in their relationship over the last month.

They're then prompted to rate how easily they could recall instances of each behavior, on a scale of 1 (this behavior did NOT happen) to 6 (I was able to think of a specific example, and I could have easily thought of several more).

This is actually a fairly clever way to measure the most negatively perceived behaviors in each participant's relationship, because what may be acceptable behavior for one couple could be a dealbreaker for another couple (ex. sleeping with another person is unacceptable for a monogamous relationship, but fine for a poly couple).

To tie this measure to the results: when a person is going through a stressful period of life, their partner's negative behaviors (as measured above, by the CRI) have a stronger impact on relationship satisfaction compared to their partner's positive behaviors.

However, the difference between the two is relatively small. Positive behavior definitely does have an impact; just a little bit less than negative behaviors.

top takeaway: given a choice, avoiding negative behavior is slightly better than engaging in positive behavior.

CreoMech on June 27th, 2018 at 15:55 UTC »

Very interesting... I mean, it goes without saying that you want to give your SO some leeway when things are falling from the sky in their life, but I had no idea that the effect of a negative interaction would be Magnified if they were dealing with stressful events. And positive interactions are downplayed... I wonder what the purpose of that change is for people?

mvea on June 27th, 2018 at 12:17 UTC »

The title of the post is a copy and paste from the firs, third and fourth paragraphs of the linked academic press release here :

Refraining from bad behavior toward a significant other during stressful life events is more important than showing positive behavior, according to a Baylor University study.

“When people face stressful life events, they are especially sensitive to negative behavior in their relationships, such as when a partner seems to be argumentative, overly emotional, withdrawn or fails to do something that was expected,” said researcher Keith Sanford, Ph.D., professor of psychology and neuroscience in Baylor’s College of Arts & Sciences.

“In contrast, they’re less sensitive to positive behavior — such as giving each other comfort,” he said.

Journal Reference:

Rivers, A. S., & Sanford, K. (2018).

Negative relationship behavior is more important than positive: Correlates of outcomes during stressful life events.

Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 375-384.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0000389

Link: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-17764-006

Abstract

When people who are married or cohabiting face stressful life situations, their ability to cope may be associated with two separate dimensions of interpersonal behavior: positive and negative. These behaviors can be assessed with the Couple Resilience Inventory (CRI). It was expected that scales on this instrument would correlate with outcome variables regarding life well-being, stress, and relationship satisfaction. It was also expected that effects for negative behavior would be larger than effects for positive and that the effects might be curvilinear. Study 1 included 325 married or cohabiting people currently experiencing nonmedical major life stressors and Study 2 included 154 married or cohabiting people with current, serious medical conditions. All participants completed an online questionnaire including the CRI along with an alternate measure of couple behavior (to confirm scale validity), a measure of general coping style (to serve as a covariate), and measures of outcome variables regarding well-being, quality of life, perceived stress, and relationship satisfaction. The effects for negative behavior were larger than effects for positive in predicting most outcomes, and many effects were curvilinear. Notably, results remained significant after controlling for general coping style, and scales measuring positive and negative behavior demonstrated comparable levels of validity.