NASA Calls '2012' Silliest Sci-Fi Film of All Time, Says 'Jurassic Park' Is Scientifically Plausible

Authored by theatlantic.com and submitted by insane__knight

Fish are washing up dead on the beach. Birds are falling from the sky (even on TV). With 2012 approaching—and with it the ancient prophecies of the apocalypse—2012, the Roland Emmerich disaster film chronicling its characters' escape from doomsday in a hovercraft, is starting to seem more and more like a documentary on our near future. But not if NASA has anything to say about it.

"The agency is getting so many questions from people terrified that the world is going to end in 2012 that we have had to put up a special website to challenge the myths," Donald Yeomans, head of NASA's Near-Earth Asteroid Rendezvous mission said. The site scientifically disproves the catastrophic scenarios depicted in sci-film films, going so far as to rank the most implausible movies. Emmerich's flick is named the silliest:

3. Armageddon (1998) (NASA clearly does not like films about using strategically placed nuclear bombs to solve our astronomical problems.)

7. What The #$*! Do We Know? (2004)

While they were at, NASA also singled out of films for their scientific plausibility. Cue paranoia:

4. The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951)

5. Woman In The Moon (1929)

6. The Thing From Another World (1951)

Read the full story at The A.V. Club.

ElChupatigre on June 4th, 2018 at 19:42 UTC »

NASA confirms Jude Law is genetically perfect...checks out

Fake_William_Shatner on June 4th, 2018 at 18:16 UTC »

I think we can all agree on one thing; Armageddon should be at the bottom of any proper list.

PrioriIncantatem on June 4th, 2018 at 16:58 UTC »

I don’t know about accurate, but I know I feel like Gattaca is the sci-fi movie I think about/reference more than any other I can think of in day to day discussions of ethics and medical advancement and whatnot. It just seems to pop up a lot. Edit: i = a