Combat High – A Brief But Sobering History of Drug Use in Wartime

Authored by militaryhistorynow.com and submitted by Chosen_Of_Tchar
image for Combat High – A Brief But Sobering History of Drug Use in Wartime

“Drugs and warfare have always gone hand in hand – from Homeric warriors drinking wine and taking opium to Wehrmacht troops popping methamphetamines.”

THE PHILOSOPHER Friedrich Nietzsche once wrote that the history of narcotics is a study of culture itself. He may very well have been speaking about military culture.

Although largely neglected by military history scholarship, intoxicants have been an integral part of war for centuries.

Stimulants have long been known to enhance combat performance, keeping personnel awake, alert, and hence alive after prolonged periods of fatigue. Intoxicants also “take the edge off” war, enabling soldiers to cope with the traumas of the battlefield. Drinking and drugging rituals have even helped soldiers bond, which is crucial for group cohesion and morale. And since long periods of boredom are also a part of war, soldiers have often reached for intoxicants because they simply have had not much else to do.

Drugs and warfare have always gone hand in hand – from Homeric warriors drinking wine and taking opium to Wehrmacht troops popping methamphetamines. The truth is, soldiers have been fighting while high for much of history. Consider the following examples.

Alcohol is the oldest and likely most popular pharmacological motivator of fighting men. For centuries, rations of spirits inspired the so-called “Dutch courage” that propelled troops into battle. Of course, different nations had different drinks of choice. For the British it was rum. The Russians turned to vodka. Ancient Greeks, Romans and the modern French preferred wine. The Germans issued beer. Americans initially doled out rum but since the Civil War, it was whiskey. The fact is that until the mid-20th century, wars were rarely fought sober.

The experience of fighting with fierce and alien enemy pumped up on drugs is hardly new. When the British decided to subdue the Zulu tribes in 1879, they faced the ferocious foe who was seemingly immune to the modern rifle fire. What made the Zulus truly fearless warriors was not just their traditional belligerence but also their pharmacopoeia. Shamans provided spearmen with various herbs, such as intelezi (a traditional plant taken in purifying rites to boost morale), medicated beer, dagga (the South African variety of cannabis which had a stimulating effect), a potent painkiller and hallucinogen produced from the “bushman poison bulb,” and probably also toadstool known as Amanita muscaria or “fly agaric.” Had the British in 1879 been familiar with the idea of zombies, they would have likely used the term to describe the Zulus who fearlessly charged them at Isandlwanda.

While it’s unclear if Zulus had access to Amanita, the mushroom was certainly used regularly by warriors in Eurasia, particularly in the Siberian tribes of Chukchi, Kamchadals, and Koryaks. The main psychoactive component of the toadstool is muscimol, which significantly enhances a soldier’s combat performance. Interestingly, because the urine of its eater retains strong psychoactive properties, drinking it was also popular among the Siberian warriors. Legends say that the tribes that consumed Amanita muscaria produced fierce “mushroom warriors.” Strikingly, Soviet soldiers – probably from Siberia – were reportedly stoned on the mushroom at the Battle of Székesfehérvár in Hungary in 1945. They performed equally fearlessly.

The First World War brought cocaine to the frontlines. The drug, which was first developed in the 1860s, was used by German and French pilots as a stimulant, as well as Canadian infantrymen. In fact, the drug was so popular among soldiers in Canada’s army stationed in the United Kingdom, it precipitated considerable moral panic among Britons in 1915. The British army issued a medicine containing cocaine and an extract from cola nuts known as “Tabloid” or “Forced March.” It was said to encourage fearlessness and offset combat fatigue. Self-prescribed consumption was also widespread as cocaine proved an effective boosting aid in the trenches. London pharmacists sold medical kits containing cocaine and heroin. Girls happily bought the boxes, advertised as “useful presents for friends at the front” and eagerly sent them to their boys, fiancés, and husbands on the lines.

If cocaine was the drug of choice between 1914 and 1918, amphetamines would become the favoured stimulant during the Second World War. In fact, the conflict was largely fought on speed and from 1939 to 1945. And frontline soldiers were the greatest consumers of amphetamines.

It was the Nazis who pioneered wholesale and systematic military doping. Their pill of choice was Pervitin, an early version of crystal meth. It energized the body, increased alertness, combated fatigue and created strong feelings of confidence. In his book The Art of War the ancient Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu writes that “speed is the essence of war.” It was certainly the essence of Blitzkrieg, for which German forces were primed by chemical speed.

Between April and December 1939, the Temmler-Werke company supplied the German military with 29 million Pervitin “attack pills,” many of which were used experimentally during the campaign against Poland in September 1939. As the drug proved exceptionally useful, at the peak of the Blitzkrieg in the spring of 1940, troops were issued some 35 million tablets. The Wehrmacht’s amazingly rapid advances appear less incredible given that in some units many soldiers took up to four Pervitin pills a day. Overall, it is estimated that from 1939 to 1945 the German military consumed some 200 million meth pills.

Britain, the U.S. and Japan followed suit, administering amphetamines to their troops. It’s estimated that British soldiers consumed around 72 million Benzedrine amphetamine tablets in World War Two. The drug was distributed largely to pilots, but also to infantrymen. For example, on Oct. 23, 1942 General Bernard Montgomery gave away some 100,000 pills to his Eighth Army before the Second Battle of El Alamein. The British high on speed managed to defeat the Germans, who were laced with meth. The role of uppers in the outcome of this battle remains, however, largely unexplored.

By 1942 Benzedrine tablets (popularly known as “bennies”) were added to emergency kits for American bomber crews and in 1943 the practice was extended to the infantry. About 15 percent of U.S. soldiers regularly took the stimulant. In fact, the Pentagon issued at least 250 million Benzedrine pills to the troops, yet the total number might be as high as 500 million. This huge range in estimates results from the fact that while we know the value of govern­ment contracts with Smith, Kline & French company, the producer of Benzedrine, the procurement price is unknown.

The Americans continued to boost their troops with amphetamine in the Korean War where the administration of dextroamphetamine became commonplace. The conflict also saw American servicemen stationed in Korea and Japan concocting their own speed balls – an injectable mixture of amphetamine and heroin. But it was the Vietnam War where the consumption of psychoactive substances by servicemen both prescribed by the authorities and self-prescribed by individual soldiers assumed alarming proportions. Authorized speed-popping was rampant. Between 1966 and 1969 the military issued 225 million dextroamphetamine tablets. According to the Pentagon, while in 1968 some 50 percent of American soldiers in Vietnam took drugs, in 1973, the year of the U.S. withdrawal, this jumped to 70 percent. Half of the servicemen doing drugs smoked marihuana, and nearly 30 percent took heroin and opium.

More recently, during the 1991 Gulf War, 58 percent of American pilots flew with dextroamphetamine support and 17 percent regularly popped “go pills,” as legal uppers are commonly referred to by the pilots themselves. Even today, combat pilots embarking on missions longer than eight hours (one-manned flights) or exceeding 12 hours (two-person crews) can each time, if all required procedures are met, obtain Dexedrine pills. Beginning in 2003, amphetamine uppers have been slowly replaced by a new generation psychostimulant, an eugoric called modafinil (Provigil). Officially, the U.S. military is the only armed force that allows for controlled pharmacology-assisted fatigue management. The policy is limited to pilots only.

However, the Chinese army is reported to introduce its own smart drug. The anti-sleep pill, referred to in the West as “Night Eagle”, is said to enable soldiers to stay awake for up to 72 hours. And at Russian pharmacies there are plenty easily available medicines, which in the West are called nootropics and are banned in sports as doping. Some of these performance enhancers developed originally for astronauts were used by the Red Army during the Afghan War (1979–1989). Compounds such as Phenotropil, Metraprote, or Mildronate work similarly as dextroamphetamine and methamphetamine but without the same serotonin or dopamine side effects. Metraprote is probably still given to special forces or rapid response units in emergency situations.

For ISIL the substance of choice is Captagon, a powerful stimulant known as fenethylline metabolized in the body to form amphetamine and fenethyline. Invented in 1961, it has become a major recreational drug in the Middle East and more recently a favored stimulant in the Syrian civil war. For fighters, it promotes alertness, enhances strength, numbs fear and induces bravado. Jihadists have been reported to consume it pervasively, while also taking powerful opioid painkillers and hashish. “Some people take so much, if you shoot them, they won’t drop,” recalled one Muslim Brotherhood militant in Syria. Intoxicated jihadists are often compared to zombies. Fueled by Captagon, they continue fighting even when gravely wounded.

A similar experience was shared by U.S. Marines during the 2004 Battle of Fallujah. The Iraqi insurgents were so heavily doped up on amphetamines and cocaine that they continued fighting despite severe injuries. When the standard firing procedure to aim at the body failed, the Marines were ordered to refocus on head shots.

Łukasz Kamieński is Associate Professor at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland and the author of Shooting Up. A Short History of Drugs and War (Oxford University Press, 2016).

Obi_Wan_Kannoli on May 23rd, 2018 at 14:03 UTC »

I'm surprised no-one posted this gem - British soldiers on LSD

Ozymandias01 on May 23rd, 2018 at 13:36 UTC »

This is a fun post for me since I study the use of drugs before modern day, essentially drug use in society from neolithic all the way to the turn of the century. I'm like a ancient drug historian. If you like this article, you should definitely check out the author's book, "Shooting Up: A short history of Drugs and War". Łukasz Kamieński is one of the few people to go in to detail about human consumption of drugs as it relates to combat. While this article focuses more on the modern use of drugs in wartime, I can recommend some other instances off the top of my head that might be interesting:

Germanic Berserkers (literally high off of anything) Scythians were nomadic steppe horse archers that were some the first peoples know to be consuming marijuana in large quantities to Herodotus. It might be argued that they were one of the first to select high THC level strains form the female flower of the pant for psychoactive intent. Here is a link to a mummy found in northwest China where they found a man buried with almost 2 pounds of flower next to him who would have been a nomadic horse archer type. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/10/marijuana-cannabis-pot-weed-burial-shroud-china-ancient-discovery-scythians-turpan-archaeology-botany/ Hashashin using well...hash (basically a ninja if you were to infuse fundamentalist islamic doctrine and a ton of psychological training aided with loads of hash. A lot has been written about this subject. African tribes have been using a variety of drugs for a very long time. Mushrooms are everywhere and are one of the biggest misunderstood/neglected drugs humans have consumed for one of the longest periods of time. Some people have proposed that mushrooms opened up new neuron pathways to our ape ancestors thus being the catalyst for human evolution. This is called the stoned ape theory, but technically its really a hypothesis. The "Drunken Monkey Hypothesis" proposed by Dudley at UC Berkeley, is essentially the same idea. I'm personally a big believer in the idea that beer came before bread and one could argue a solid case that alcohol consumption is principally linked to the formation of organized societal structures...not a lot of time but when I get back I can expand on it later. Mesopotamian drunk armies were essentially the norm for millennia as well as Greece and other Mediterranean powers. One could also look at the role of the lotus flower and how its mild psychoactive effects are MUCH more pronounced under the role of alcohol. (Looking at YOU Egypt!) Mesoamerican soldiers using everything under the sun from Coca to ayahuasca/peyote/mushrooms

-Opium cannot be overstated enough. If there is one thing I would like to have more time to study in my research it would be the role of the poppy flower. It is mentioned in the earliest of pharmaceutical text and would have been a miracle of a pain killer but it would be difficult to see it used for combat because it doesn't have the stimulating or mind altering effects you would want in a soldier. Might be very good however at calming soldiers before battle by ingesting or dissolving raw opium into alcohol. This would help keep the anxiety of the front lines down, while not impairing their frontal lobe cortex TOO much where they can't stab the guy they need to.

Would love to write more, but I got to run. I'll be back later to answer any questions any of you guys might have just comment below.

EDIT: I've been getting a lot of inbox request to expand on the the topic of beer and alcohol in forming society. So I will go a little more into detail about this. The basis of the idea is that homosapiens were nomadic for a vast period of time, until we started settling down in the past 9-10,000 years ago (will talk about Gobekli Tepe in a second). The main reason we stopped moving around so much was to grow barley for beer production. A couple of reasons for this:

The Holocene-the climate epoch shifted to what we are more accustomed to now. People could now grow certain crops in areas they could not grow before and coincides with the first River Valley Civilizations. Since one could now grow barley quite efficiently, all one had to do was the smash the grains and put them in some warm water for a little bit and tada! you got a little buzz going on after you drink it. Beer would have been nutritional for calories, safer to drink than water in some cases, and since you have to be around to grow it and get some harvests in for the year, you can't be moving around all the time. You might as well put up a couple of buildings and also a temple and a ruler and wait..are we getting civilization? Why not bread? The traditional approach is that humans produced bread first. This is being challenged more than ever before. While bread was certainly being produced at some early sites like Çatalhöyük, Jericho, etc. its obvious beer was also being produced. So what came first? First off, there are a number of sites where you find two-row barley husk grains and no presence of emmer, einkorn, or any other type of wheat. You also don't find the charcoal carbon residue from baking bread that you would expect from these sites. It is a lot harder to make bread from barley than wheat and even where we only find wheat like in the Natufian culture, still not a lot of evidence it was being baked into bread. Plus...the early grains in ancient times have been scientifically proven to be easier to work with via fermentation. Ganj Dareh in the Zagros of Iran (first place to domesticate goats) is important because you only find two row barley and no wheat even though wheat can be grown. Large grinding stones and large vats for storage of some kind. These sites are pretty old, but lets put on our fancy time travelling shoes and take a walk down the timeline to Gobekli Tepe on the border of South Eastern Turkey and Syria. 11,000 years old and standing strong with massive stone pillars forming an early neolithic hunter gathering area. At only 5% excavation we've already found 3d relief carvings and wait for it....6 stone vessels testing positive for Calcium Oxalate. Calcium Oxalate occurs when you smash, soak and ferment some grain. Oh YEAH!

Why not Wine?

- Wine certainly was there when we first started forming villlages and the first cities. Hajji Firuz has yielded some of the earliest wine in vessels coated in Pistachio Resin. While grains were easier and faster and obviously much earlier, wine was right behind it and played a major role in sedentary lifestyles as the role of viticulture became a bigger in society. While I'm talking about it, I want to point out to people that you will hear a lot of things from textbooks to that "guy" who works behind the wine bar of where wine comes from. There are technically three answers to this question and it all depends on what you consider wine.

1) If wine is something fermented that isn't grain then its China 9000 years ago where wild honey and rice.

2) If wine must be fermented from the wine making grape, vitis vinifera, then its North West Zagros Mountains 7000 years ago.

3) If wine is vitis vinifera AND fermented using the modern yeast,* saccharomyces cerevisia*e, then it is Ancient Egypt 5000 years ago during the reign of the Scorpion King.

Wooh, might have to grab a beer and return to this later, people have suggested I do an AMA, but maybe in the future we'll see how much traction this post gets.

Chosen_Of_Tchar on May 23rd, 2018 at 11:59 UTC »

Highlights (for me):

• TIL Siberian "Mushroom Warriors" are Night Goblins

• The British used to issue "Forced March" tablets containing cocaine to their troops.

• The Wehrmacht issued their men with meth to keep them going in the field and the British plied their troops with benzedrine for the same reason.

I really do wonder if ancient battles in particular were a bit less "300" and a bit more "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas". How the hell can people tripping balls on mushrooms be expected to fight in a battle?