For the last two years, Richard and Linda Brown have been living in a shell of a home -- no insulation, drywall or flooring -- while trying to raise four kids.
Their house in Louisiana was destroyed by floodwaters in 2016. At the time they didn't panic, because they had a flood insurance policy worth $168,000. To date, they've received less than half of that -- around $62,000.
"We pay into this premium, and all I want is [it] just to be fair, and we weren't getting fair," Linda said.
Two years later, they're living in a house that's still exposed down to the studs.
"The kids have to live like this. They can't have friends come over. We can't have family come over because we're living like this. And it's hard," Linda said.
The Browns decided to fight the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in court. Established 50 years ago to help flood victims, the NFIP is run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and responsible for all flood policies in the United States. Insurance premiums and taxpayer dollars fund the program, to the tune of about $3 billion a year.
But FEMA doesn't administer all the policies. It outsources most of them to private insurance companies called "write your owns," or WYOs.
The WYOs -- and all of their agents -- get paid out of the same pot of money as flood victims. Some years, up to two-thirds of that money goes to the WYOs -- and the attorneys they hire to fight flood victims' claims.
In effect, by paying their premiums on time every year, homeowners like the Browns help fund the very lawyers fighting them in court.
"It's like people make money off disaster. The more they can make, the better," Richard said.
A 2016 government report found little oversight of flood litigation spending by FEMA. One flood case was estimated to cost $87,000 in legal fees, just for trial preparation. That homeowner's policy limit was $25,000.
Gerald Nielsen's Louisiana law firm was hired to fight the Browns' claim. For more than 30 years, Nielsen has been the go-to lawyer for insurance companies fighting against flood victims -- a role for which he has drawn anger from Congress.
"He dealt with [Superstorm] Sandy victims like they were the perpetrators, enriching himself at their expense," New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez said during a Senate hearing, referring to the 2012 hurricane that did billions of dollars in damage to the East Coast.
A New York judge called his "misconduct" in one Sandy case "remorseless," saying Nielsen's failure to "exercise reasonable diligence" harmed flood victims.
Court documents show Nielsen's firm demanded depositions to verify receipts, a process that would have cost far more than the bills themselves.
"Can you imagine losing everything that you have ever had in your life? And you paid for insurance," said John Houghtaling, the Browns' attorney. His law firm also represented victims of Sandy in court against Nielsen's firm.
"There was no effort to mitigate the cost. In many cases, we were asked to have experts re-inspect -- for a third time -- homes that were totally destroyed," Houghtaling said.
A public information request revealed FEMA paid Nielsen's firm at least $29 million for Sandy cases alone.
Nielsen declined our request for an on-camera interview. He hadn't acknowledged receiving our questions, so our producer went to his office. A man said he was there, but "not available."
We caught up with him in the parking garage to ask about his legal fees.
"I've got to go through ethics counsel because some of what you asked clearly is privileged," Nielsen said.
Later, Nielsen wrote CBS News a letter saying he was acting at the direction of his clients and all his bills were reviewed by the clients and FEMA.
The Browns have a message to the people who could do something about their situation.
"We just want to put the house back together and we're still like this right now," Linda Brown said. "Just think about what we're going through. We're not asking for much. We just want our house back together so we can just be happy again. That's all."
LucasLeArtist on May 1st, 2018 at 06:25 UTC »
I spent a year working in FEMA Corps (basically an internship), and spoke to many survivors who had their homes damaged or destroyed by Harvey, Irma, and Maria. Soooo many people got screwed over by their insurance. You pay out the ass for coverage each month and as soon as something actually happens they come up with some bullshit reason to leave you without help. Luckily many of these people were able to get government assistance (It's a common misconception that FEMA won't help you if you have insurance), but it'd be nice if the insurance companies would do what they're supposed to instead of passing the burden to the taxpayers. The only people that were saved by insurance, that I saw, were wealthy people that could afford the best of the best. Everyone else got screwed.
Edit: Flood insurance is subsidized by the government through the NFIP but the policies are managed by private companies (as stated in the article), so the taxpayer is also screwed in that situation. I was thinking of hurricane damage in general, rather than flooding specifically.
SigmaHyperion on May 1st, 2018 at 04:48 UTC »
Going through this now with standard homeowner's.
I wanted to make a small claim for water damage on a policy rider that has just a $500 deductible. Total payout would be maybe $2K.
Several weeks of waiting, countless phone calls, who knows how much paperwork on their end, 2 master plumbers, leak specialists, structural engineer reports (and I think they're going to need another one)... all in an effort to determine the ultimate cause of the problem and whether it's covered under the policy or not. The problem is fixed -- I took care of that with my own plumber as soon as it happened. They're just trying to assign 'blame' now.
They've already spent more than what my claim would be just to determine whether or not the claim is actually covered under the policy.
i0datamonster on May 1st, 2018 at 02:48 UTC »
Of course they do, flood insurance is all government funds allocated by the NFID. It was meant to be temporary as a means to buy out property owners in flood plains. The government couldn't enforce it so they continue to fund it.
Insurance companies are contracted as brokers to sell the policies. They litigate every claim. If they paid out on every claim the fund would be depleted ending the program. Which would also mean the end of their government cash cow.