‘Moderate’ drinking guidelines are too loose, study says

Authored by washingtonpost.com and submitted by Quanttek
image for ‘Moderate’ drinking guidelines are too loose, study says

A sweeping international study of alcohol consumption has found no overall health benefits from moderate drinking and calls into question the U.S. guidelines that say men can safely drink twice as much as women. The threshold for low-risk drinking, the researchers found, is about seven beers a week for men and women alike.

The new report, published Thursday in the Lancet and boasting 120 co-authors, aggregated data from multiple studies of drinking patterns and health outcomes among nearly 600,000 people in 19 high-income countries.

Strikingly, the data did not show a significant difference between men and women in the amount of alcohol that can be consumed without a drop in life expectancy. That directly contradicts U.S. government guidelines that define moderate, “low-risk” drinking as two drinks a day for men and one drink for women, with a limit of 14 a week for men and seven for women — with lower levels for people over the age of 65.

There’s a transatlantic difference of opinion about drinking limits for men and women. Two years ago, the United Kingdom revised its moderate-drinking guidelines, reducing the limits for men to the same level as those for women. The new study says the United Kingdom got it just about right.

“When the U.S. reviews their guidelines, I would hope they would use this as evidence to consider lowering the guidelines for men probably in line with female guidelines,” the study’s lead author, Angela Wood, a senior lecturer at the University of Cambridge, told The Washington Post.

This research recalibrates the concept of moderate drinking and gives a more complicated, nuanced interpretation of how alcohol affects cardiovascular health for better or worse. That interpretation is not likely to be welcomed by the alcohol industry, which has embraced the idea, backed by the medical establi shment, that moderate drinking may be good for you by lowering the risk of a heart attack.

Wood and her colleagues did not find an overall health benefit. The aggregated data did show that moderate drinking is associated with a lower risk of nonfatal heart attacks. The common explanation is that alcohol can boost high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the “good” cholesterol, which can be protective against arterial blockages.

But alcohol consumption, even at that allegedly moderate level, is also associated with a suite of cardiovascular problems, including stroke, aortic aneurysm, fatal hypertensive disease and heart failure. The data show that the bad effects offset the good.

“Drinking more may reduce the risk of nonfatal heart attack, but actually, let’s balance that against the higher risk of stroke and other fatal cardiovascular diseases and shorter life expectancy,” Wood said.

Alcohol consumption is also associated with higher risks of several types of cancer, including breast cancer. The new study confirmed an association between drinking and cancers of the digestive system.

“It’s a very impressive study,” said Aaron White, senior scientific adviser at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, part of the National Institutes of Health. “The issue of moderate drinking and its health effects is a very important one, because the majority of people in the country drink and most of those people do so moderately. It’s important for us to be able to advise people what level of consumption is safe.”

As for the threshold for low-risk drinking, White said, “there’s no magic number here. The effects of alcohol on health are very complicated. The effects are influenced by a wide range of factors, like body weight and sex, medications, rate of consumption, so it’s very hard to arrive at one single threshold below which everybody’s going to be safe from harm.”

The new research does not suggest that a drinker who has just a little too much every day is falling off an epidemiological cliff. Instead, a little bit too much causes a little lower life expectancy. But as the drinker ventures further beyond the threshold, the life expectancy continues to erode in dramatic fashion.

Wood and her colleagues found that the threshold for health risks is 100 grams per week (about the alcohol in seven standard American beers, though craft beers have higher alcohol content). The drop in life expectancy for a 40-year-old who drinks between 100 and 200 grams is six months, on average, compared with someone who drinks between zero and 100 grams, the study found. Drinking 200 to 350 grams was associated with a one- to two-year decline in life expectancy, and drinking more than 350 grams corresponded to a four- to five-year drop, on average.

These warnings should be heeded by physicians when talking to their patients about their drinking habits, said one of the study co-authors, Dan G. Blazer, professor of psychiatry emeritus at Duke University School of Medicine.

“I think this is perhaps a good warning that even what they may consider to be moderate – which might be a couple of drinks a day, every day of their lives – may be too much,” Blazer said. He added that he would like to see the country embrace a public health messaging campaign focusing on the health dangers of excessive drinking.

For women, heavy drinking has been normalized. That’s dangerous.

There are medications that can treat alcoholism, but doctors rarely use them

I tried mindfulness to quit drinking. It actually worked.

BobADemon on April 16th, 2018 at 12:35 UTC »

I thought that US guideline had to do with body weight differences, and less on gender, being that women on average are smaller than men. Meaning that for the average citizen the guideline is a good guide.

Edit: More about intoxication and less longterm health.

prince_harming on April 16th, 2018 at 12:10 UTC »

They keep hitting this "alcohol is good/bad" ball back and forth, it's gotta be confusing to a lot of people. I'm inclined to believe that people shouldn't be drinking with the aim of harnessing any potential health benefits, and instead should just understand that, for most people, the occasional drink isn't necessarily going to do them much harm. It seems like a lot of people use the "daily drinking is healthy, right??" excuse to indulge more than might be wise for them. Either way, it's too early for giving sweeping recommendations like that, in either direction.

Honestly, as an Applied Human Nutrition grad, this is one of the more frustrating things that both nutrition professionals and people in general have to deal with. There are just far too many generalized statements about things which, I think, don't take into account individual factors. When you're dealing with something as regular and lifelong as, well, eating, those differences can pile up over time, leading to vastly varied outcomes. This can lead to a lot of inconclusive science for nutrition professionals to try to sort through, and a lot of misunderstood information for everyone else. Just taking into account differences in activity level and lifestyle, saying that "X is good, Y is bad," is often misleading. "Good" or "bad" for whom is often either not stated or conclusively definable in the research, not specified--or contexualized--in the reporting, or is totally misunderstood by the layman. As a result, we get people treating population-subset-specific findings as if they can be generalized across an entire population. It just leads to so much confusion and contradiction in the general discourse. This is why people need dietitians more than they appreciate. (And I say this as someone who, degree notwithstanding, currently has no plans to become one.)

With all that going on, it's no wonder so many people can't take Nutrition seriously as a science.

Sir_Wemblesworth on April 16th, 2018 at 09:08 UTC »

The NHMRC of Australia has already done away with the sex difference of alcohol consumption. It's a solid no more than two standard drinks a day, no more than four on any one occasion, and ideally none when pregnant or breastfeeding. This is all regardless of sex.

Edit: updated some words.