Assaults Increased When Cities Hosted Trump Rallies, Study Finds

Authored by nytimes.com and submitted by shiruken
image for Assaults Increased When Cities Hosted Trump Rallies, Study Finds

Mr. Trump himself repeatedly seemed to endorse attacks on his detractors, too.

“Maybe he should have been roughed up,” he said of one protester who was reportedly punched and kicked in November 2015. “I’d like to punch him in the face, I’ll tell ya,” he said of another a few months later. He even offered to pay legal fees for his supporters if they became too aggressive.

The supporters also often aimed offensive and violent rhetoric at Mrs. Clinton, suggesting she be killed.

To determine whether those words and news reports corresponded with an actual shift in violence, the researchers compiled a list of 31 Trump rallies and 38 Clinton rallies held in cities with assault data available online.

They compared the number of assaults reported on the day of the rally to the number reported on the corresponding day of the week, for each of the four weeks before and after the event.

Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you're not a robot by clicking the box. Invalid email address. Please re-enter. You must select a newsletter to subscribe to. Sign Up You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services. Thank you for subscribing. An error has occurred. Please try again later. View all New York Times newsletters.

On a typical day, cities saw an average of 19.4 assaults, they found. On the day of a Trump rally, that number rose to 21.7.

The pattern held even when the researchers controlled for the influence of factors like population size, data sources and the day used for the comparison.

The researchers offered two explanations for the increase in assaults. Either they were the result of clashes at or near the rallies, or they occurred elsewhere in the cities after the aggressive mood on display by Mr. Trump, his supporters or his opponents had spread through “social contagion.”

There were some limitations to the findings, the authors noted. They may not apply to the rallies or cities that weren’t studied, and a greater police presence during the rallies may have made it more likely for an assault to be reported.

TheCarm on March 17th, 2018 at 02:25 UTC »

You people give me such hope asking further questions such as "whom is assaulting whom?" instead of assuming one side or the other. Im glad to see critical thinkers question these clickbait headlines, thank you.

(not sarcasm)

RonTheTiger on March 17th, 2018 at 01:51 UTC »

Just so everyone understands. It's 2.3 more assaults. Not 2.3 times more assaults...

I assume many people (myself included) misread the title as 2.3 times more assaults. 2.3 more assaults for pretty much any city is a tiny blip within a margin of error..

bootintheass on March 16th, 2018 at 21:37 UTC »

Does it say who is assaulting who?