Further Reading Why cops won’t need a warrant to pull the data off your autonomous car On Monday, the California Department of Motor Vehicles approved new rules that would allow self-driving cars to hit the road without a human behind the wheel, ready to take over at any time.
The new regulations, which take effect as of April 2, will pave the way for companies like Waymo, Uber, GM, and others to continue autonomous vehicle (AV) testing on the roads of the Golden State and likely will lead to the technology becoming mainstream.
In 2014, California was the first state to adopt rules for testing autonomous vehicles on public streets. But many now feel that those regulations were too prescriptive and were not flexible enough to adapt to a technology that is maturing rapidly. As a result, testing programs have flourished in other states, like Arizona.
"This is a major step forward for autonomous technology in California," DMV Director Jean Shiomoto said in a statement. "Safety is our top concern and we are ready to begin working with manufacturers that are prepared to test fully driverless vehicles in California."
Further Reading San Francisco to DMV: How should cops deal with self-driving cars that park wrong? Among other requirements imposed as part of the permitting process, companies must show that there is a link for remote control, allowing the car to be operated from afar. The rules were discussed during a hearing in Sacramento in 2017.
AV makers must also provide a "law enforcement action plan," which includes instructions that explain how to contact the remote human operator and how to disengage the AV mode, among other requirements. The rules do not say what kind of data law enforcement will be able to access from AVs.
Consumer Watchdog, a group that has routinely opposed AV technology, slammed the new rules in a statement on Monday.
"A remote test operator will be allowed to monitor and attempt to control the robot car from afar," said John M. Simpson, the group's privacy project director. "It will be just like playing a video game, except lives will be at stake."
Corbiskeith on February 28th, 2018 at 08:37 UTC »
I mean, it can't be any worse than the cars with people driving them...
Pravus_Belua on February 28th, 2018 at 08:02 UTC »
To the growing chorus of people down in the comments going on about this not being ready and all that, please read the article.
This is about expanding the rule-set so that the manufacturers of these vehicles can continue testing. Even though this now permits completely autonomous vehicles on the streets the companies that make them know that they (and we) aren't ready for it, which is why full autonomy protocols aren't active even in the few models that have the capability.
If more assurance is needed, look to AZ. They've had greater leeway in this arena for a while now, to a point that CA is actually behind the curve.
People are not being mowed down by amoralistic machines, motorists aren't being trapped behind AVs in the passing lane, the sky has not fallen in.
slouchingupward on February 28th, 2018 at 02:45 UTC »
I feel like this was passed much faster than legalizing recreational marijuana was....