Terry Crews: 'I Still Have to Send a Check to My Molester'

Authored by thewrap.com and submitted by Johnny_W94
image for Terry Crews: 'I Still Have to Send a Check to My Molester'

Terry Crews says he still pays his former agency WME despite the sexual assault case he’s pursuing against company executive Adam Venit.

“This is the deal,” Crews told reporters at Esquire’s 2018 Mavericks of Hollywood party on Tuesday night, according to Page Six. “What’s so strange and crazy is that I’m still paying them. I go to work, and I still have to send a check to my molester.”

Crews filed a sexual assault report against Venit with the Los Angeles Police Department in December, saying his former agent groped his genitals at a party. The case is currently under review at the District Attorney’s office, and Crews has also filed a separate lawsuit.

Also Read: Terry Crews Sexual Assault Accusation Sent to District Attorney by LAPD

The “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” star fired the agency after going public with his accusation, later signing with UTA, but the actor said he’s still paying WME all these months later.

“This is Hollywood, it is insane,” Crews said. “I look at my bank statement, and I’m like, ‘Damn, this is the most wrong thing of all time.’ I’m calling it, I’m going to play this whole thing out. If I don’t get justice, nobody can.”

WME completed a two-week investigation into Venit’s conduct and stripped him of his position as head of the agency’s motion picture group, opting to keep him on as an agent — a move Crews described at the time as Venit getting “a pass.”

Also Read: Terry Crews Accuses WME of Spying on Him and His Family Over Sexual Assault Case

“[Venit] tried to tell everyone it wasn’t sexual. How do you do that? How is that possible? The level of ridiculousness that this has gone to, and they’re looking at me as if I’m ridiculous for even saying anything,” Crews said. “I’m not putting up with it. No one should. No woman, no child, no man, anywhere, in whatever business, should ever put up with being treated less than a human being, ever.”

HenryKushinger on February 21st, 2018 at 21:30 UTC »

"[Venit] keeps trying to claim that it wasn't sexual"

Okay, let's assume that it wasn't sexual and there was some other reason for groping someone else's genitals. How does that somehow make it okay?

TheRealSmom on February 21st, 2018 at 20:04 UTC »

How is that exec not in a massive shitstorm right now?

phasePup on February 21st, 2018 at 19:39 UTC »

This sickens me.